Entering a country does not grant you the right to demand changes that cater to your preferences.
If you choose to come, it must be with the intention of belonging. Pluralist societies that prioritize their own interests over the greater whole will ultimately implode.
When immigration is executed correctly, it fortifies a nation. Look at the United States before the globalist agenda took hold—it functioned effectively.
What we witness across the Western world today is not genuine immigration; it is fragmentation, exploitation, and in many instances, cultural colonization, as evidenced in the UK, Denmark, and the Netherlands.
We’ve allowed a monumental deception to permeate our discourse: that immigrants should be welcomed without any conditions—no requirements for language proficiency, civic understanding, or allegiance.
This isn’t immigration; it’s an occupation by invitation, and it’s utterly reckless.
Take the UK as a stark example:
Once a beacon of the rule of law, the UK has devolved into a landscape of parallel societies. In cities such as Leicester, Birmingham, Luton, and even London, there are enclaves that adhere to different customs and informal legal systems, all of which challenge British law.
Law enforcement often turns a blind eye, school boards succumb to radical ideologies, and British citizens frequently feel like second-class residents, silenced by the fear of being labeled bigots. Practices such as multiple wives living separately while claiming benefits as single parents undermine the law, sending a clear message to citizens: your laws are malleable, but ours are not.
In the U.S.:
Regions like Dearborn, Minneapolis, Texas, and California are witnessing a similar decline:
- Schools and city councils operate in foreign languages.
- Sharia-inspired policies are taking root.
- The American flag is either disrespected or outright replaced.
- Many newcomers seek to recreate their homeland instead of integrating into American society, and this cannot be permitted in any country.
What has happened to the principles of learning the language, respecting the Constitution, and pledging loyalty to the flag? This monumental deception has erased those values. Immigrants must come to contribute, not merely consume. They must honor the flag and integrate into a unified society, not foster division.
If you cannot commit to this standard, do not come.
This isn’t about race, religion, or nationalism. It’s about safeguarding the identity of nations and ensuring that all individuals are treated equally under one law.
Whilst not particularly religious, my wife and I (who is Indian) like to visit churches. At the weekend we visited two beautiful churches in Derbyshire that were full of local history and culture. My concern is that with the rapid pace of demographic change, there is a danger that this culture and history will be lost forever. Why would a young person in sixty years time from a Nigerian background for example, be interested in a load of old white people who used to be in the majority but now are not, their culture no longer dominant and now rarely seen? This potential loss of culture and history which spans more than a thousand years truly worries me.
Entering a country does not grant you the right to demand changes that cater to your preferences.
If you choose to come, it must be with the intention of belonging. Pluralist societies that prioritize their own interests over the greater whole will ultimately implode.
When immigration is executed correctly, it fortifies a nation. Look at the United States before the globalist agenda took hold—it functioned effectively.
What we witness across the Western world today is not genuine immigration; it is fragmentation, exploitation, and in many instances, cultural colonization, as evidenced in the UK, Denmark, and the Netherlands.
We’ve allowed a monumental deception to permeate our discourse: that immigrants should be welcomed without any conditions—no requirements for language proficiency, civic understanding, or allegiance.
This isn’t immigration; it’s an occupation by invitation, and it’s utterly reckless.
Take the UK as a stark example:
Once a beacon of the rule of law, the UK has devolved into a landscape of parallel societies. In cities such as Leicester, Birmingham, Luton, and even London, there are enclaves that adhere to different customs and informal legal systems, all of which challenge British law.
Law enforcement often turns a blind eye, school boards succumb to radical ideologies, and British citizens frequently feel like second-class residents, silenced by the fear of being labeled bigots. Practices such as multiple wives living separately while claiming benefits as single parents undermine the law, sending a clear message to citizens: your laws are malleable, but ours are not.
In the U.S.:
Regions like Dearborn, Minneapolis, Texas, and California are witnessing a similar decline:
- Schools and city councils operate in foreign languages.
- Sharia-inspired policies are taking root.
- The American flag is either disrespected or outright replaced.
- Many newcomers seek to recreate their homeland instead of integrating into American society, and this cannot be permitted in any country.
What has happened to the principles of learning the language, respecting the Constitution, and pledging loyalty to the flag? This monumental deception has erased those values. Immigrants must come to contribute, not merely consume. They must honor the flag and integrate into a unified society, not foster division.
If you cannot commit to this standard, do not come.
This isn’t about race, religion, or nationalism. It’s about safeguarding the identity of nations and ensuring that all individuals are treated equally under one law.
I’m tired of the ‘racist’ term.
If you can’t contend with arguments on their merits without resorting to labeling and name calling, then don’t take part in the discussion.
When someone does this it’s a clear sign that you should end the conversation.
You can’t reason with ideologues.
Whilst not particularly religious, my wife and I (who is Indian) like to visit churches. At the weekend we visited two beautiful churches in Derbyshire that were full of local history and culture. My concern is that with the rapid pace of demographic change, there is a danger that this culture and history will be lost forever. Why would a young person in sixty years time from a Nigerian background for example, be interested in a load of old white people who used to be in the majority but now are not, their culture no longer dominant and now rarely seen? This potential loss of culture and history which spans more than a thousand years truly worries me.